|
btastat.com
|
|
|
REFERENCES
|
|
Studio comparativo multicentrico tra BTA Statä
e citologia urinaria nella diagnosi di carcinoma vesscicale
[Article in Italian]
P. Bassi1, R. Carando1, M.
Norcen1, F. Pagano1, H. Leyh2, M.
Marberger3, P. Conort4, C. Sternberg5,
V. Pansadoro5, L. Boccon-Gibod6
1 Istituto di Urologia, Università
degli Studi di Padova (Italia), 2 Technical University of
Munich (Germany), 3 University of Vienna (Austria), 4
Hopial Pitié-Salpèriere,
Paris (France), 5 Ospedale Pio XI, Roma (Italia), 6
Hopital Bichat, Paris (France)
SUMMARY
- To compare sensitivity and specificity of the BTA Statä
test with urine cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer
specimens from 240 patients with or without definitive diagnosis of
bladder cancer have been evaluated in a
multicenter and prospective study. In 107 patients with
cytoscopically confirmed bladder cancer, the overall sensitivities
of BTA Stat and cytology were 65% and 33% respectively. For tumor
grades 1, 2, and 3 the sensitivities of BTA Stat were 39%, 67%, and
83%, in comparison with a sensitivity of cytology of 4%, 20%, and
69%, respectively. The specificities of the BTA Stat and cytology in
the 124 patients without bladder cancer were 64% and 99%
respectively. The specificity of BTA Stat was lower in patients with
benign or malignant genitourinary diseases other than bladder cancer
(46%) than in patients without such diseases (71 %).
In conclusion, BTA Stat is more sensitive than cytology in the
detection of bladder cancer; it could replace cytology in the diagnosis
and follow-up of patients with bladder cancer. Any cause of false
positive diagnosis must be excluded.
UROLOGIA PRACTICA 2: 63-67, 1998.
|
BACK TO REFERENCES
|